Did you actually try it? I seem to recall people complaining about actually getting an uncaught error so maybe if you have a bug there it will cause a problem much sooner.
On 1/3/14 3:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> I wish I'd thought of this last night, but the try/catch also absorbs >> errors in getters, >See what you mean now. If you data field is set to a user defined setter >and that RTEs before the error would get silently eaten. > >That seems like a bad idea to me but it is existing SDK behaviour. So do >we keep the change or not? Any opinions? > >Pros: >- less CG >- slightly faster >- (IMO) tell users about issues in their code > >Thanks, >Justin
