Hi, > Hmm. Maybe there's need for some improvement to the guideline's wording. > It really should only be my call to say if I don't want to continue in the > role and up to the PMC with community input as to whether I should > continue if I'm willing to do so (which I am).
Sorry but I have to disagree there. Back when we first discussed the bylaws (now guidelines) and what the chairs term should be consensus was that the chair should be for a year/reviewed every year. A lot of other Apache projects use the one year term for chairs [1][2][3][4] (+ more) - although the exact wording/rules vary a little. IMO having the chair commit to the role for a year (every year) is important - as is having the role rotated. You can certainly propose a change to the guidelines and have it voted on if you want it changed. Thanks, Justin 1. https://cloudstack.apache.org/bylaws.html 2. http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html 3. http://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Bylaws 4. http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html
