+1 on the lazy removal. No one expects half of the list subscribers plus one to vote :-)
EdB On Saturday, November 9, 2013, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/8/13 10:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >> Hmm. Well Roy emailed recently in some other similar discussion to > >>confirm > >> that majority is not "full majority". > >So what do you suggest re changes to the guidelines? > Taking out Lazy everywhere except for "Lazy Consensus". > > > > >I can point to at least one example of where Majority was interoperated > >to be more than 1/2 the voting pool. > Maybe we should be clear about that in our definitions. > > > > >Looking at project bylaws I'd guess more than 3/4 use the term "Lazy > >Majority" even though it not included in the official glossary. > I think I'll stir the pot on Incubator and ask ;-) Sometimes, a bad > phrase just propagates. > > -Alex > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
