Hi, We left the discussion on using Falcon on the SDK with the idea to see what it would take get Mustella tests to pass. Alex wrote:
>>There is no embedded font support in Falcon at this time, so running >> Mustella is guaranteed to generate a lot of failures. I suppose that some >> energetic person could make a branch that doesn't have the embedded font >> libraries and use MXMLC and generate all new baselines and fix >> AssertPropertyValues that expect numbers based on embedded font metrics >> and then prove that Falcon can run and pass all of these tests, but Feeling particularly energetic today, I decide to give it a go. I cloned a fresh SDK and build it, explicitly declining the embedded font offer from the ant script. Sure enough, when I next tried to run Mustella on the Label component, it balked with the message "Mustella uses embedded fonts" I bypassed this test, and Mustella ran... perfectly, passing all 255 tests. I thought the idea was that without embedded fonts, a whole bunch of tests would fail and I'd create new baseline images that we'd then use to test Falcon, figuring that the lack of embedded font support causes a lot of the Mustella failures when using Falcon as a compiler... What am I doing wrong? If the Label tests don't use embedded font support, than something else is causing all those failing bitmap compares when using Falcon... Thoughts? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
