On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> +1 (carryover). I did verify that the rc1 source tar has the same content > as rc2, but was puzzled to find that the signature files aren't the same > even though they are correct for their respective packages. That seems > surprising to me. Can someone explain? > > I think I rebuilt the packages with the same source code. Could be because of a new timestamp or something like that? > On 10/23/13 12:11 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.7 to be > >released. > > > >*The votes from RC1 will be carried over. If you want to change your > >vote, > >you can. As mentioned in the [DISCUSS] thread, only the Windows binaries > >have changed in RC2. The source kits, Mac and Linux binaries are > >unchanged. > >* > > > >Issues addressed in this release: > >- OSMF 2.0 support > >- OSMF.swf RSL creation > > > >The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.7/rc2/ > > > >The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, > >available here: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.7/rc2/binaries > > > >Before voting please review the sections: > >What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at > >http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at > >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > >Vote > >[ ] +1 Approve the release > >[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > > > >This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > >Regards, > >Om & Justin > >
