+1 (carryover). I did verify that the rc1 source tar has the same content as rc2, but was puzzled to find that the signature files aren't the same even though they are correct for their respective packages. That seems surprising to me. Can someone explain?
On 10/23/13 12:11 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.7 to be >released. > >*The votes from RC1 will be carried over. If you want to change your >vote, >you can. As mentioned in the [DISCUSS] thread, only the Windows binaries >have changed in RC2. The source kits, Mac and Linux binaries are >unchanged. >* > >Issues addressed in this release: >- OSMF 2.0 support >- OSMF.swf RSL creation > >The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.7/rc2/ > >The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, >available here: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.7/rc2/binaries > >Before voting please review the sections: >What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at >http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > >Vote >[ ] +1 Approve the release >[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > >This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >Regards, >Om & Justin
