On 10/10/13 12:31 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
>Yes, I am just calling describeType vs decribeTypeJSON. > >JSON is returning an unstructured object with the following props: >isDynamic: Bool >isFinal: bool >isStatic: bool >name: String >traits > accessors: Array of unstructured Objects . > bases: Array of Strings , for the hierarchy of supers > interfaces > metadata > methods > variables > constructor > >Access should have same performance than E4X .. ? OK, I might be remembering incorrectly. I thought describetype's XML was not flat and the superclass's accessors were not listed with the subclass's accessors. If you can get to all accessors of all superclasses in one shot then yes, it won't matter. -Alex
