Anything that is a single column list really. So that should include some sort of dropdownlist. So what this means is you'll need a more generic spinner that uses any standard dataProvider. Utilizes labelField and dataField properties. It should be inherited to new child components for specific things like dateSpinner, timeSpinner, booleanSpinner, etc.
BTW spinners don't have to be limited to vertical scrolling, it could scroll horizontally for some things as well. -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Mohr [mailto:flex.masul...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:32 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [UX] Spark DateFieldSpinner Also have in mind ... the Spark DateFieldSpinner could be used to set time values (like hours & minutes), too ... not only dates :) -- Sebastian (PPMC) Interaction Designer Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code: http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Sebastian Mohr <flex.masul...@gmail.com>wrote: > > And if you add Keyboard-enabled (arrows) that would be perfect. > Please have in mind, to use the keyboard with in the Spark DateFieldSpinner > you need to have a focus enabled SpinnerList which is probably not the > case for the moment. > > > -- > Sebastian (PPMC) > Interaction Designer > > Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code: > http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Maurice Amsellem < > maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > >> Excellent idea. >> Mouse wheel is much more accurate than mouse swiping. >> And if you add Keyboard-enabled (arrows) that would be perfect. >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Mark Kessler [mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com] >> Envoyé : vendredi 4 octobre 2013 01:14 >> À : Dev@Flex >> Objet : Re: [UX] Spark DateFieldSpinner >> >> I love the look of spinners in general. But if I could use a mousewheel >> to skim quickly through a spinner and it could have easing effects. I'd be >> all for the desktop version. >> > > >
