I should add that I have not updated the jQuery sample to reflect the
changes that have been happening to the "standard" JavaScript code. I
figured I would sort that out once things became more complete and stable.
--peter
On 9/26/13 9:17 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 9/25/13 11:57 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Turns out there is a bug in the Falcon code that the search for
>>>IFlexInfo
>>> only is in the baseclass and not deeper.
>>>
>>> JQuery's app does not directly implement IFlexInfo. Adding that is
>>> probably the cheapest workaround for you.
>>
>>
>>Awesome, thanks for looking into this. So, what exactly should the get
>>info() method look like? I dont see an example anywhere.
>org.apache.flex.core.Application defines this stub:
>
> public function get info():Object
> {
> return {};
> }
>
>The compiler overrides it to return an object with some properties in it.
>I don't believe we've documented what goes in it. You shouldn't need to
>know that to get the jQuery_Sample to run, just add "implements IFlexInfo"
>to the jQuery Application class.
>
>
>The contents of the info() structure have changed from release to release,
>and FlexJS currently ignores most of it (RSLs, ResourceBundle list etc).
>You can see it by using -keep with MXMLC. Falcon doesn't support -keep.
>
>HTH,
>-Alex
>
>
