Hi Fred, IMO, it doesn't matter if it has bugs. If you just take a quick look at the code and say it seems reasonably organized and smaller than the Spark DG that's good enough for me. Then start some sort of vote unless it is really just a few files. Use [VOTE] or [LAZY] or [POLL] but IMO, we should draw attention to the fact we're doing this.
-Alex On 9/24/13 10:43 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >@Maurice, that's fine, I've got your email with the attachment, so, anyone >would like to test it is free to ask me to forward him. > >@Om, yep, sounds good. > >-Fred > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash >Muppirala >Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 19:33 >À : dev@flex.apache.org; jef...@dot-com-it.com >Objet : Re: Flex Mobile DataGrid donation submission > >On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jeffry Houser ><jef...@dot-com-it.com>wrote: > >> On 9/24/2013 1:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >> >>> We've been voting on sizeable non-Adobe contributions. Swiz was the >>> last vote. >>> >> >> Fair enough. Swiz is an entity separate, but complimentary to the >> Flex Framework. It seems like a mobile optimized DataGrid is more >> like a really big patch. >> > >I agree. I really dont think we need to vote on this. If some committer >wants to veto this, they can go ahead and do so. We can start a >discussion >about the reasons for the veto at that point. > >A lazy vote should probably suffice in this case. > >Thanks, >Om > > >> >> However, I'm not opposed to voting. >> >> >> >> -- >> Jeffry Houser >> Technical Entrepreneur >> http://www.jeffryhouser.com >> 203-379-0773 >> >>
