On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

> In theory, if the project name matches the application.mxml name, then the
> external tool should overwrite the swf and you shouldn't need to mess
> around with the external tools and templates.
>

The problem is what Peter explained.  The debug launch causes mxmlc to
compile the swf just before launching.  Altering the name keeps the falcon
compiled swf intact.

Thanks,
Om


>
> Is that not working for you or does the application name have a different
> name than the project?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/20/13 4:14 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I fixed this for myself by doing this:
> >
> >In the FlexJS debug and release build external tool's arguments:
> >Change:
> >-output="${project_loc}\bin-debug\${project_name}.swf"
> >to:
> >-output="${project_loc}\bin-debug\${project_name}_flexjs.swf"
> >
> >Then, for each FlexJS project, we need to change index.template's params
> >settings:
> >change:
> >"${swf}.swf", "flashContent",
> >to:
> >"${swf}_flexjs.swf", "flashContent",
> >
> >Now, when we run FB's debug option, project_name.swf gets created by mxmlc
> >but we will be running project_name_flexjs.swf which was compiled by
> >falcon.  This should let us debug the app as usual.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> With a little direction from Alex, I'm able to run the app too. Here's
> >> what happened to me:
> >>
> >> I created a new Flex project and then imported the code from
> >> DataBindingTest. I deleted the default application Flash Builder created
> >> and I then changed the project's properties and made
> >>DataBindingTest.mxml
> >> an Application and made it the default application.
> >>
> >> Cannot do that. Flash Builder still uses mxmlc to compile that.
> >>
> >> To fix this, I renamed DataBindingTest.mxml to my project's original
> >> default application name, selected it and built it with the FlexJS
> >> external tool and now it works correctly.
> >>
> >> --peter
> >>
> >> On 9/19/13 3:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I stepped through my working copy of DataBindingTest.
> >> >
> >> >The initHandler in Application.as gets called first, and sets up the
> >> >ValueManager.  Then, the MyInitialView gets addedToParent, which fires
> >>off
> >> >the MXMLDataIntepreter which assigns the states.
> >> >
> >> >Which made me look at the call stack and again, there is the dreaded
> >> >XXX_c() which means that Falcon did not compile the SWF, MXMLC did.
> >> >
> >> >-Alex
> >> >
> >> >On 9/19/13 10:58 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>As far as I can tell, this is what is happening:
> >> >>
> >> >>"states" is a property of ViewBase and the property is being set very
> >> >>quickly upon application load. The states setter function is assuming
> >> >>there is a valuesImpl loaded into the ValuesManager, but that's not
> >>the
> >> >>case because the Application's initHandler hasn't been called yet and
> >>it
> >> >>is there that valuesImpl is set in the ValuesManager.
> >> >>
> >> >>Not sure yet how to deal with this, but I will work on it.
> >> >>
> >> >>--peter
> >> >>
> >> >>On 9/19/13 12:09 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>I'll let you do the digging, but make sure the capitalization is
> >>right,
> >> >>>and that it is using the same ValuesImpl as DataBindingTest.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>On 9/19/13 9:02 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>I'm not making any headway on this. There is a global style
> >>declaration
> >> >>>>which should associate a state implementation with any class:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>global
> >> >>>>{
> >> >>>>    iStatesImpl:
> >> >>>>ClassReference("org.apache.flex.core.SimpleStatesImpl");
> >> >>>>}
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>I don't know why this isn't being picked up. I'm going to try
> >> >>>>DataBindingTest and see how that goes.
> >> >>>>--peter
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>On 9/19/13 11:12 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>I am looking into this.
> >> >>>>>--peter
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>On 9/19/13 1:03 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>I haven't tried StatesTest in a while.  Can you work with
> >> >>>>>>DataBindingTest
> >> >>>>>>instead?  It should have everything StatesTest has and more.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>-Alex
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>On 9/18/13 9:58 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>>wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>I picked this project up [1] after a while and when I run the
> >>app, I
> >> >>>>>>>am
> >> >>>>>>>getting this RTE:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a
> >>null
> >> >>>>>>>object
> >> >>>>>>>reference.
> >> >>>>>>>    at org.apache.flex.core::ViewBase/set
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>states()[C:\p\flex_os\workspace\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\frameworks\
> >>>>>>>>>as
> >> >>>>>>>\
> >> >>>>>>>s
> >> >>>>>>>r
> >> >>>>>>>c
> >> >>>>>>>\
> >> >>>>>>>o
> >> >>>>>>>rg\apache\flex\core\ViewBase.as:83]
> >> >>>>>>>    at
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>MyInitialView()[C:\p\flex_os\workspace\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\exam
> >>>>>>>>>pl
> >> >>>>>>>e
> >> >>>>>>>s
> >> >>>>>>>\
> >> >>>>>>>S
> >> >>>>>>>t
> >> >>>>>>>a
> >> >>>>>>>tesTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml:23]
> >> >>>>>>>    at StatesTest/_StatesTest_MyInitialView1_c()
> >> >>>>>>>    at
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>StatesTest()[C:\p\flex_os\workspace\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\example
> >>>>>>>>>s\
> >> >>>>>>>S
> >> >>>>>>>t
> >> >>>>>>>a
> >> >>>>>>>t
> >> >>>>>>>e
> >> >>>>>>>s
> >> >>>>>>>Test\src\StatesTest.mxml:26]
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>I resynced recently and I am guessing some recent changes break
> >>this
> >> >>>>>>>app.
> >> >>>>>>>When I step through the debugger, it looks like
> >> >>>>>>>ValuesManager.valuesImpl
> >> >>>>>>>is
> >> >>>>>>>returning null.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>Alex/Peter, can one of you please take a look?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>Thanks,
> >> >>>>>>>Om
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>[1]
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>
> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/flex-asjs/examples/StatesTes
> >>>>>>>>>t
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to