Yes, but I think Justin opened one for you. I think it is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33739
Please check and add yourself to the watch and vote. -Alex On 9/18/13 12:48 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: >Is raising a JIRA directly the right approach to proposing new features >or behavior change (such as the one below)? > >Thanks > >Maurice > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >Envoyé : mardi 17 septembre 2013 20:26 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : MultiBitmapSource > >Hi Community, > >MultiBitmapSource getSource(dpi) method is called 3 times in the SDK with >exactly the same code: > > var app:Object = FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication; > var dpi:Number; > if ("runtimeDPI" in app) > dpi = app["runtimeDPI"]; > else > dpi = DensityUtil.getRuntimeDPI(); > var multiSource:Object = >MultiDPIBitmapSource(source).getSource(dpi); > > >Wouldn't it be better to have this code embedded in the MultiBitmapSource >getSource() method ? > >The desiredDPI:Number arg could be made optional, so as not to break >existing code, and use the above code when desiredDPI is NaN . > >Another advantage of this is that it will allow to use MBS with other >classes, such as BitmapAssets. > >What do you think? > >Regards, > >Maurice > > >
