The hash should be compared with the one of the server but the server doesn't return a hash AFAIK
-----Message d'origine----- De : Mark Kessler [mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 5 septembre 2013 02:09 À : Dev@Flex Objet : Re: [Intaller] Speed up download No that makes sense, so my next question is.... should we have each file hashed in some automatic way and stored in a summary file. Then only one file at a time could be bad? On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote: > The difference IMo is that chunks haven't got hashes, only the final > file can be checked but I might be wrong. > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Mark Kessler [mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com] > Envoyé : jeudi 5 septembre 2013 01:50 > À : Dev@Flex > Objet : Re: [Intaller] Speed up download > > It has lists of lengths, number of pieces, hashes for each piece. If > it end up with a bad piece it can go out again and retrieve that piece > over. > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrent_file > > -Mark > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Frédéric THOMAS > <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > I guess they don't, at the end you could have a corrupt file IMO > > >
