>And: >Someone should review the quality of the provided projects (quality of >provided images, logos, description) to avoid ugly content, or small projects >from some "newbies". > >"Newbies" sounds hard, but not the quantity, the quality counts. >When a new developer creates a nice first project and there are 20 user ... >this is great, but to promote this project on the official flex sites is not >so amazing.
I think you have misdiagnosed the problem. We don't have *any* Flex apps showcased up on the Apache Flex website at the moment. Nor, do we have a volunteer to get this content written and images placed into HTML or a live app that is available for a user to play with on some page on the site. IMO, the problem is that we lack *someone* doing the work - not that something currently being shown has inadequate quality. Is this issue important enough to you to do something about it?