>And:
>Someone should review the quality of the provided projects (quality of 
>provided images, logos, description) to avoid ugly content, or small projects 
>from some "newbies".
>
>"Newbies" sounds hard, but not the quantity, the quality counts.
>When a new developer creates a nice first project and there are 20 user ...
>this is great, but to promote this project on the official flex sites is not 
>so amazing.

I think you have misdiagnosed the problem. We don't have *any* Flex apps 
showcased up on the Apache Flex website at the moment. Nor, do we have a 
volunteer to get this content written and images placed into HTML or a live app 
that is available for a user to play with on some page on the site.

IMO, the problem is that we lack *someone* doing the work - not that something 
currently being shown has inadequate quality. Is this issue important enough to 
you to do something about it?

Reply via email to