ADG and DG assume that the data items are complex types. Folks complain occasionally and we've always told them "as designed". I have no idea how hard it would be to break that assumption.
-Alex On 8/3/13 7:55 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >Was taking a look at: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-32999 > >Any chance the attachment(s) can be added? > >While looking at this issue I've found several other bugs (they may be >other JIRA issues not had a deep look yet). >1. An ADG with a array of strings as a dataprovider assumes "length" (the >only property of the string class is the first column). This is easy to >see, not a regression 94.6, 4.91 do the same) like so: ><mx:AdvancedDataGrid dataProvider="" /> > >2. You get RTEs if you make a ADG with an array of simple types (strings, >numbers etc) editable. ><mx:AdvancedDataGrid dataProvider="{['one','two','three']}" >editable="true" /> > >Anyone seen these in JIRA/run into them? > >Thanks, >Justin
