Hi Guys :-) Today I think I reached an important milestone with my generator-maven-plugin. This will definitely need some fine-tuning, but I think I'll do that on the way. At least now I can generate any form of code from any sort of Java Class File or Source File. That was the big step I needed in order to continue with the maven-flex-plugin (By the way ... am I allowed to name it that way? The "maven" prefix of a plugin seems to be reserved for official maven plugins supported by Apache ... so I guess it should be ok).
I was intending on supporting only the falcon compiler and would start to support only Apache Flex and FlexUnit first (No need for high blood preasure ... the other stuff should come as the plugin matures). Think I will be needing quite some input from anyone on the Falcon Compiler team. Is there any sort of documentation for using and configuring the compiler programmatically (not using the intermediate commandline)? Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013 16:23 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: IntelliJ - ApacheFlex4.9.1 - flexmojos 6.0.1 Hi Chris, yeah! Thanks to the big effort you and Jose made combined with latest IntelliJ IDEA 13 EAP bug fixes, I think we finaly has a dream enviroment to develop with. There's space to improvements and better workflows but I definitely think we reach an important milestone :) As I said, I trying to get time to mavenize falcon and then flexjs and reach a point where we can introduce Stage3D / Starling Framework - we already have this one! ;) -. I'm in the believe that this are the kind of things that make the difference between Apache Flex and the plethora of javascript frameworks out there. Thanks for all the hard work behind flexmojos 6.0.1 Chris! :) 2013/7/31 christofer.d...@c-ware.de <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > I'm happy that FM 6.0.1 seems to be working without any major hickups > :-) > > Chris > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] Im > Auftrag von Carlos Rovira > Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juli 2013 15:28 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: IntelliJ - ApacheFlex4.9.1 - flexmojos 6.0.1 > > Hi, > > just let you know that my pull request was accepted and now Apache > Flex > 4.9.1 and Flexmojos 6.0.1 is the base of the starling framework maven > build > > :) > > Carlos > > > 2013/7/30 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > > > Hi, > > > > just let you know that I made a pull request to starling framework > > to upgrade to flexmojos 6.0.1 and Apache Flex for building starling > > maven artifact. > > > > https://github.com/PrimaryFeather/Starling-Framework/pull/372 > > > > still if anyone knowns something about the "Adobe" text info in the > > swf tag I was referring in my email and can help to unveil the > > mystery that is welcome :) > > > > Best > > > > Carlos > > > > 2013/7/29 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > > > >> This is the public link to my screenshot that was not attached in > >> my > >> email: > >> > >> > >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8496144/swfinspector_starlingap > >> ac > >> heflex_491.png > >> > >> > >> > >> 2013/7/29 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I was trying to build Starling Framework with flexmojos 6.0.1 > >>> upgrading the starling pom from 4.6.0 to 4.9.1 and testing > >>> IntelliJ new Cardea EAP where we finally get the fix to build with > >>> flexmojos > Apache Flex SDK. > >>> > >>> All seems to go ok and I get successful compilation in both ways: > >>> running pom and using "Make" with IntelliJ. This is very good news > >>> since we really have an IDE that supports Apache Flex SDK with > >>> maven using new flexmojos 6.0.1 version and is not tied to adobe > >>> namespace. > >>> > >>> To see that output is ok I use SWFInspector to search inside > >>> library.swf inside the generated starling output swc library > >>> > >>> And I see this tag (see attached screenshot capture) > >>> > >>> <ProductInfo product='Adobe Flex' edition='' version='4.9' > >>> build='1447119' compileDate='Mon Jul 29 09:56:41 2013 UTC'/> > >>> > >>> Seems all is ok with version numbers but ProductInfo is "Adobe Flex" > >>> instead of "Apache Flex". > >>> > >>> It seems that there's some "Adobe" literal yet in the SDK code? > >>> Someone knows what could be happen? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Carlos Rovira > >>> Director de Tecnología > >>> M: +34 607 22 60 05 > >>> F: +34 912 94 80 80 > >>> http://www.codeoscopic.com > >>> http://www.directwriter.es > >>> http://www.avant2.es > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> Director de Tecnología > >> M: +34 607 22 60 05 > >> F: +34 912 94 80 80 > >> http://www.codeoscopic.com > >> http://www.directwriter.es > >> http://www.avant2.es > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > Director de Tecnología > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > F: +34 912 94 80 80 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > http://www.directwriter.es > > http://www.avant2.es > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Director de Tecnología > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > F: +34 912 94 80 80 > http://www.codeoscopic.com > http://www.directwriter.es > http://www.avant2.es > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es
