Very cool :) for your mail I thought that examples had this update but I can't see modified examples in the commits? maybe I'm missing something?
2013/6/26 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > Hi, > > I just checked in the beginnings of {} databinding in FlexJS. If you look > at the source code, the SimpleBinding and ConstantBinding beads that were > in the earlier examples are replaced by {} expressions. The compiler > generates a data structure describing the bindings, and a bead interprets > the data structure and sets up the bindings as needed. In this early > version, the binding bead is looking for a specific pattern that can > resolve to what should be faster ConstantBinding and SimpleBinding > expressions. The rest of this week I'll be working on more and more > general and complex cases. > > The reason binding is applied by a bead is because it allows you to > optimize by replacing general databinding beads with beads that know > something about the binding context. For example, in this prototype, the > ViewBaseDataBinding bead knows that it is setting up bindings for a > ViewBase which means that it can make assumptions that, for instance, the > applicationModel structure itself will not be changing (its properties > will, but not the reference to the model). And that means you can use one > less watcher and you can apply initial values at initComplete and not > necessarily at the instantiation of each widget. > > -Alex > -- Carlos Rovira Director de TecnologĂa M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es