Very cool :)

for your mail I thought that examples had this update but I can't see
modified examples in the commits? maybe I'm missing something?



2013/6/26 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>

> Hi,
>
> I just checked in the beginnings of {} databinding in FlexJS.  If you look
> at the source code, the SimpleBinding and ConstantBinding beads that were
> in the earlier examples are replaced by {} expressions.  The compiler
> generates a data structure describing the bindings, and a bead interprets
> the data structure and sets up the bindings as needed.  In this early
> version, the binding bead is looking for a specific pattern that can
> resolve to what should be faster ConstantBinding and SimpleBinding
> expressions.  The rest of this week I'll be working on more and more
> general and complex cases.
>
> The reason binding is applied by a bead is because it allows you to
> optimize by replacing general databinding beads with beads that know
> something about the binding context.  For example, in this prototype, the
> ViewBaseDataBinding bead knows that it is setting up bindings for a
> ViewBase which means that it can make assumptions that, for instance, the
> applicationModel structure itself will not be changing (its properties
> will, but not the reference to the model).  And that means you can use one
> less watcher and you can apply initial values at initComplete and not
> necessarily at the instantiation of each widget.
>
> -Alex
>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
Director de TecnologĂ­a
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F:  +34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.directwriter.es
http://www.avant2.es

Reply via email to