@Carlos: Interesting idea. I had already created a Flex 4 implementation of
PopUp / Alert that can be used in a declarative way (see
https://github.com/RIAstar/SkinnablePopUpFx). I'll see if I can tweak it to
leverage your idea; don't think it should be too hard.
Max


On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>wrote:

> 2013/6/8 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
>
> >
> > Good point, we forgot about that.  It might be possible to use includeIn
> > to defer its instantiation or add some other attribute that works like
> > that but isn't tied to states.
> >
> >
> So from your response seems you're thinking in a state implementation
> similar to what we have today in flex 4, isn't it?
>
> Regarding deferred implementation maybe the proposal could be something
> like a value object that holds all config properties of the alert dialog
> (this will be the example posted by Peter) and the "show" method will be
> the one that unchains the process of create the UI Object through a static
> method. So all alerts VOs will be only a proxy that are very light weight
> and only it will pay as you go when calling "show" through delegating the
> work to the class that generates the fat UI object.
>

Reply via email to