A year back, someone at Flex Brazil group asked me why we couldn't simple have a MVC approach into the SDK.
My short answer was We prefer you decide which way you want to code, rather than force you on our perspective way. For mature and freedom of choice we should not have such only a way of coding, like explicit someone to code on that specific way. We have a plethora of Flex frameworks out there, if we include one, we should include all of it. For the freedom of choice that's why I voted -1. ---------------------------- Igor Costa www.igorcosta.com www.igorcosta.org On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > I think this is a valid vote and there is no need to declare it > invalid. There is only one definite, binding -1 (Igor) and he declined > to explain his motivation, something that is customary when casting a > negative vote. > > Once Chris Scott 'officially' donates Swiz - there are some hoops he > has to jump through, but we'll get to those when he contacts us- we > can create a new repo for it: either a general 'flex-contrib/swiz' or > a specific one, like 'flex-swiz', we need to discuss that a bit more, > I think. > > Thank you Carlos for managing the vote and keeping track of this donation. > > EdB >
