On 5/29/13 3:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> IIRC, there is some reason we can't release them together. >They require separate release candidate and votes. Vote on both at once >may stretch out the process is my concern. Well, to get Om's 24 hour goal, we'd have to have both votes open at the same time and close out the SDK vote first. I'm not sure how bad that will be. Then we can use the installer as another way of testing the SDK's binary kit. > >> Isn't it that the Installer can't be certified to install the latest >>SDK until we put >> the SDK in its final URL? >When we release a new SDK all we have to do it update the config file for >the installer to pick it up so it should be easier this time. My concern here is that historically, I think we don't get serious about testing the installer until the vote thread starts and then there is a minimum 72 hours and then we get feedback about issues from folks and create more RC's and vote threads and time just seems to slip by. It would be great to just have a 24-hour gap by making the installer capable of installing an RC. -Alex