Is this a good time to talk about moving Mustella out of the sdk repo? On May 10, 2013 9:35 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > > On 5/10/13 5:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >> I see. But shouldn't we rely on the mustella console output? That's > what we > >> did when in SVN. > > At the time you run the test sure, but you may forget which one failed > after > > fixing a bug or two and git status is a lot lot faster than rerunning the > > tests. > That presumes the test failed with a bitmap failure which isn't always the > case. And each run cleans up bad.pngs from prior runs beforehand. > > I suppose we could try taking failures.txt out of the gitignore and > changing > mini_run to delete it if there are no failures, but even then, it will only > show you if your last run failed. > > > > Given that no one is likely to check these files in and they indicate an > issue > > than needs to be fixed I think it's safer to have have them in > .gitignore. > You can remove them from gitignore if you want, but just realize that their > existence is not a foolproof way of knowing you have failing tests. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
