On 5/2/13 2:52 AM, "Tigran Najaryan" <tig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys, is there still interest in using RIATest to test apps compiled using
> FalconJX?
I'm still interested. And thanks for the generous offer.
> If there is I can go ahead and try to move this forward. I think
> we can do this:
>
> 1. My company will prepare a special license agreement for Apache Flex use,
> 2. Apache Flex team can review and help amend it to make it suitable,
> 3. Once the license agreement is ready we will incorporate it in RIATest so
> that when registered in a special way it will show the agreement and will
> adhere to its usage rules.
I'm wondering how this will work. In an open-source development model, both
committers and non-committers should be able to get the source and run tests
in order to prove that changes they make don't cause any problems. The only
difference is that non-committers submit patches, but committers can check
in directly.
Hopefully, many of these people are going to be legitimate RIATest
customers. Do they get to use the free license to test their applications?
If not, how does the license checker determine whether that person is
testing the Flex SDK or their application?
> 4. I will need someone's help to integrate RIATest into Flex SDK build.
It would probably be best if you submit patches to build scripts and the
readme. You would likely earn committer rights that way and then would be
able to make changes directly going forward.
>
> I have earlier submitted a sample test that uses RIATest to verify
> FlexTestAgain example. You can see it here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33489
>
> Thanks,
> Tigran.
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
