On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > This discussion seems familiar. Justin has the ASF viewpoint for the most > part. Talk to infra and David Nalley about the issues in expanding out to > github. > > Regards, > Dave >
Before I bother Infra about this, do you think you can point me to some past discussion about this? Thanks, Om > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 8, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com > >wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Think we may be missing the point here there's nothing to stop a > committer > >> from using github for their own experiments now, but if that code is > >> eventually donated into the Flex project it would need to: > >> > >> 1) Any contributors who have a made a large contribution have signed a > >> ICLA and agree to this code being donated. Just having an ICLA signed > may > >> not be enough as it may not been clear that the intent was to move the > code > >> to Apache Flex. So in git hub are all contributors easily identified and > >> contactable? > > Notifying the contributer when they send a "pull request" to a > committer's > > whiteboard project should serve exactly this purpose. > > > > > >> 2) Development should be in the open and all current committers notified > >> of progress. At the very least discussion about the code need to take > place > >> on the development list (and not elsewhere ie in github) and all > >> changes/diffs to the code need to mailed to commit mailing list. > > > > We will experiment with the organization settings to see if all this is > > doable. > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > > >> > >> Having the whiteboards in git hub would be no different. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Justin >
