Or, it might have something to do with your last ASJS commit... remove flash.*.* from implicit imports... If you revert that locally, does FalconJx work? It wasn't there yesterday, so that's the only difference in code between you and me.
We need to set up functional testing for Falcon/FlexJS soon! EdB On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > Nope, Safari works well for me, and there doesn't need to be the extra > method in the main HTML anymore, I remember. Weird. > > EdB > > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> Maybe I'm doing something wrong... the example on my p.a.o works for you? >> >> http://people.apache.org/~erikdebruin/flexjs/ >> >> Maybe try Chrome? >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> I'm not seeing anything like that in the HTML wrapper. Safari is definitely >>> throwing on exception on "new Event". Any idea what I'm doing wrong? >>> >>> >>> On 3/30/13 7:54 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>> >>>> I left out FlexGlobals on purpose, I plan to bring the Google Closure >>>> way of dealing with events to FlexJS. The GC way is not dependent on >>>> DOM based events and fits very snugly with the way Flex handles >>>> events. >>>> >>>> In the mean time I've a method in the "main" HTML that is called Event >>>> and that passes the event through to FlexGlobals for now. >>>> >>>> EdB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi Erik, >>>>> >>>>> I finally got time to try to switch over to FalconJX. It produces js >>>>> files >>>>> and the app shows up, but the console shows an exception and the >>>>> interactivity of the application is mostly broken because the generated js >>>>> code has snippets like this: >>>>> >>>>> models.MyModel.prototype.set_labelText = function(value) { >>>>> var self = this; >>>>> if (value != self._labelText) { >>>>> self._labelText = value; >>>>> self.dispatchEvent(new Event("labelTextChanged")); >>>>> } >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> In the FalconJS output, we are calling FlexGlobals.newObject because Event >>>>> is a special class in the browser that can't be instantiated via "new" and >>>>> FlexJS is using these DOM Events. >>>>> >>>>> Did I miss a flag, or can I go about trying to intercept these calls and >>>>> have them call FlexGlobals.newObject instead? >>>>> >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/29/13 11:58 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok, we're back in business! I think this time I have been working with >>>>>> the right version of FlexJS (the one with the timer and the drop down >>>>>> list?) and it looks to work as advertised: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~erikdebruin/flexjs/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Time to get packing for the long flight ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> EdB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Ah, and there's plenty left for you to "learn" from :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> No worries. Might be a good way for me to learn how it works by >>>>>>>> getting >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> to work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 3/29/13 12:31 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Uh oh... Turns out I was testing against an outdated ASJS lib >>>>>>>>> (pre-fb614905ac), so FalconJx DOESN'T WORK against the current >>>>>>>>> iteration of FlexJS. Sorry about that. I will work on that today, but >>>>>>>>> I don't have a lot of time, so it might be a while before I can catch >>>>>>>>> up, due to next week's travel to the land of golden opportunity. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> And another update (things are going much better than I expected): >>>>>>>>>> FalconJx can now emit a fully functional version of the >>>>>>>>>> FlexJSTest_again demo application. You can see it in action here >>>>>>>>>> (provided you use Chrome or Firefox, I just noticed): >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~erikdebruin/flexjs/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Onwards and upwards ;-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into it for specifics, but of the top of my head it >>>>>>>>>>> seems that this most depends on the implementation in the FlexJS JS >>>>>>>>>>> framework. Emitting the strings required by that framework should >>>>>>>>>>> really be easy enough. If needed we can "look forward" into AST to >>>>>>>>>>> look for binding information. I do this in several other places >>>>>>>>>>> already. Even the binding expressions shouldn't be too much of a >>>>>>>>>>> problem, again depending on how this will be handled by the JS >>>>>>>>>>> framework. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> [Bindable] results in extra codegen. Binding expressions with {} >>>>>>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>>>>> whole >>>>>>>>>>>> other ball of work. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think in FalconJX you might have to modify the node tree in >>>>>>>>>>>> several >>>>>>>>>>>> places >>>>>>>>>>>> when you hit a [Bindable] node. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It isn't working correctly in FalconJS either, but my "customer" >>>>>>>>>>>> needs >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm hacking a fix. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/13 1:28 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, not yet. How is this set up in FlexJS? I'm sure I can read >>>>>>>>>>>>> Metadata >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> Databinding information, so I guess it depends on the requirements >>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> emitted JS if I can easily implement this ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 27, 2013, Alex Harui wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does FalconJX handle [Bindable]? My "customer" is using it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/13 11:56 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another one popped into my head just now: I have a gut feeling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a bit of circular logic going on in the whole 'backend', >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'blockwalker' and 'emitter' construct. More specifically in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the references to them are passed around as arguments in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructors for the various classes. But I can't wrap around it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to figure out whether it's wrong and if so, what might be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about it. Don't get me wrong, it works well, it's just that it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't "elegant". And that's in no way a comment on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effectiveness >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or quality of your code, just something I thought I'd share and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what you think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually I think it works fine. The problem you are facing is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MXML emitter I am sure. This adds complexity to what you are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accomplish and it is circular from the perspective of using AS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MXML. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a buffer writer(output stream), a writer, a visitor and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emitter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Each one takes a dependency of its parent. Trust me, if there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> child that knows about its parent I am blind. Like I said, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> block >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walker is a visitor and the emitter is a visitor. You cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escape >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fact there is recursion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you can think of a more elegant way to set it up, by all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> write a prototype. Remember, I wrote this with an atom bomb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and lighting in the sky, there may be parts that could be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logicalized. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have another full compiler in Randori that I am going to use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proof of concept with compiler plugins and my ASDoc compiler I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I guess we both can experiment, we can agree to leave the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alone for the time being. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Erik de Bruin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just kidding ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm really happy with FalconJx, once you get to know it it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pleasure to work with. I hope my last commits didn't give you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional work in your other projects? I did my best to leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> APIs alone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are plenty of TODOs in the code, and I would also like to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest some kind of code review or something (I'm not used to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in groups, but that seems like a nice thing to do), since I've >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piling on stuff. I did my best to keep everything clean and in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the spirit of the rest of the code, but there are some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> areas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where I'd like to have a second opinion. Like with the code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copied between the DOC and JS emitters, seems there might be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> room >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement there. Also of note is the way I've implemented the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emitting within the MXML emitter, not really sure if I did the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing there. And finally (not really, but this is all I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for now, after the marathon hacking I did today) there is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whole >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programming to interfaces, not implementations" part that we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nearly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adhere to, but not quite, we might have another look at that as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Michael Schmalle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No thats not what I meant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am saying with the Randori project compiler, I have not had to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> touch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core framework for weeks and it is compiling 1000's of lines of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application code now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What I meant to say was, the design keeps people in the correct >>>>>>>>>>>>>> spaces. :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note; I AM SURE there are as3 bugs coming, its just nice not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having to chase >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them right now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flex SDK Team >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>>>> Flex SDK Team >>>>>>>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>>>>>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>>>>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>>>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Alex Harui >>>>>>>> Flex SDK Team >>>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>>>> >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alex Harui >>>>> Flex SDK Team >>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Alex Harui >>> Flex SDK Team >>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
