+1 with Carlos

check it out this:  Git Patterns and Anti-Patterns: Scaling from Workgroup to 
Enterprise
--
Jose Barragan
Chief Software Architect
Codeoscopic Madrid
C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92. 
Planta 5.  505.
28020 Madrid.
Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80

On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Jose Barragan <jose.barra...@codeoscopic.com> 
wrote:

> +1 with Carlos
> <rc178-010d-git-patterns-antipatterns_1.pdf>
> 
> --
> Jose Barragan
> Chief Software Architect
> Codeoscopic Madrid
> C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92. 
> Planta 5.  505.
> 28020 Madrid.
> Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
> 
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Frederic,
>> 
>> in our experience working with GIT we saw that was extremely helpful to
>> have visual track of each set of commits that are a single fix,
>> functionality, feature or whatever, since you can always operate and have
>> much control as branches grow and ramifies. In the particular case you
>> point (single commit - flat history) it's a matter of tastes but making it
>> flat for this particular case makes you lost visibility as GIT workflow
>> evolve over time. Right now we could make it flat (at this point of
>> simplicity), but I recommend not to do it since in few months we should
>> expect more complex GIT graphs and this kind of loops will help to see
>> others what historically happen.
>> 
>> Apache Flex is so huge and modular and over time we should organize in a
>> way that make us possible to plan huge releases with lots of modules,
>> changes and consistence between pieces. We are right now at the very
>> beginning trying to get the basic management and functionality but as
>> people will understand the full potential of the tool and the kind of
>> thinks we can now do, things will complicate. As we discussed in other
>> thread some weeks ago, I suspect that we will end in an
>> "dictator-lieutenant-apache" model (as we talked with Beltran the apache
>> part is that decisions must be consolidated in this list to adopt such
>> model), since it's what I see in other big open source projects where sub
>> teams are organized in repositories and they commit in such repositories
>> while the "lieutenant" assemble the final "module" (this happen in the same
>> way all the way to root until reach the "dictator"). As we said, if we end
>> in this model, the apache way will be less restricted in repo permissions
>> and more conducted by the list where people will assign the tasks to a
>> single person.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>> 
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>> 
>>> This merge you did make me think I didn't talk about this case on the wiki
>>> [1], so I updated it, in short, while it is good to start a branch as you
>>> did for a new jira ticket and as you may don't know the final number of
>>> commits you will have at the end, once it is the time to merge, you know
>>> the number of commits you did, if you realize you've got only one, it is
>>> better to do a 'git rebase <my_branch>' instead of a 'git merge --no-ff
>>> <my_branch>, the reason behind that is that you can avoid the extra merge
>>> commit, practically nothing change, except you will have a flat history
>>> which is what we want for only one commit and it could be reverse/reset the
>>> same if needed.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Fred
>>> 
>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/FLEX/Good+**
>>> vs+Bad+Git+usage<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Good+vs+Bad+Git+usage>
>>> 
>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: carlosrov...@apache.org
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:12 AM
>>> To: comm...@flex.apache.org
>>> Subject: [2/2] git commit: Merge branch 'FLEX-33349' into develop
>>> 
>>> Merge branch 'FLEX-33349' into develop
>>> 
>>> * FLEX-33349:
>>> Fix TypeError #1009 happening in dataProviderRefreshed() of List.as after
>>> refreshing the dataProvider of Combobox.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Project: 
>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo<http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo>
>>> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/flex-sdk/commit/**
>>> 39fdf7fa <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/commit/39fdf7fa>
>>> Tree: 
>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/flex-sdk/tree/**39fdf7fa<http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/tree/39fdf7fa>
>>> Diff: 
>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/flex-sdk/diff/**39fdf7fa<http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/diff/39fdf7fa>
>>> 
>>> Branch: refs/heads/develop
>>> Commit: 39fdf7fa81329fa60eb95efc374375**a901c34d3d
>>> Parents: 6282657 5ca083e
>>> Author: Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@gmail.com>
>>> Authored: Wed Mar 27 03:12:08 2013 +0100
>>> Committer: Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@gmail.com>
>>> Committed: Wed Mar 27 03:12:08 2013 +0100
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**----------
>>> .../projects/spark/src/spark/**components/List.as    |   23
>>> +++++++++++----
>>> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**----------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Carlos Rovira
>> Director de Tecnología
>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>> F:  +34 912 94 80 80
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> http://www.directwriter.es
>> http://www.avant2.es
> 

Reply via email to