Well, that's a bit disappointing, if not entirely surprising given you previous statements.
I'll see what I can do about MXML support, but that's going to be a major thing for me, so it'll take time. Just curious: how many developers need to work on FalconXX/ASJS for you to change your mind? Currently I count Gordon, Alex, Peter, Cyrill, Frank, you and me as (reasonably) active contributors... EdB On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote: > Hey, > > No, I can't do MXML, it's not in my current project scope and I don't have > enough time in the day. I kept saying that business logic was my goal of the > project (falconjx), I stubbed in MXML in *my approach* so there is a > solution. It's just a process of traversing the DOM of the MXML. > > If we had more developers knocking down the doors wanting to contribute to > this project, I might think differently. > > Mike > > > Quoting Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>: > >> Alex, >> >> I played around with MXML in FalconJx a bit. There is already >> rudimentary support implemented. From my quick glance it looks like we >> need Mike for this, as he set the wheels in motion and is most >> familiar with the approach chosen for FalconJx::MXML. Mike has >> indicated that he is currently working on other projects and will >> finish the AMD parser first, before returning to MXML. >> >> Maybe is we ask him nicely he'd be willing to take MXML support just a >> little further, just enough to support FlexJS? If FlexJS development >> uses FalconJx, I can much more easily contribute (port FlexJS to a >> full 'goog' approach) and all our efforts will be made on the same >> code base, which can only speed up work on ASJS. >> >> Mike, pretty please? >> >> ;-) >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>> Falcons already called closure compiler. I just moved where it was called >>> and got it to handle multiple files. >>> >>> We need to get jx to handle mxml in order to switch. Do you have time for >>> that? I want to get basic css working and do some as refactoring first. >>> >>> >>> Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. >>> >>> Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Alex, >>> >>> From your latest commit, it looks like we're doing a lot of work >>> twice. I finished the inclusion of the GCC (incl. deps etc.) into >>> FalconJx a couple of weeks ago. >>> >>> I have some cycles open in the near future. What do you think, time to >>> move FlexJS from FalconJS to FalconJx? >>> >>> EdB >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ix Multimedia Software >>> >>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>> >>> T. 06-51952295 >>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > > -- > Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC > http://www.teotigraphix.com > http://blog.teotigraphix.com > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
