I did not realize that Apache Flex does not use RSLs by default. What's the story with signing? Is that an issue with cross-domain security? Is there any way to get an Apache signature approved for Flash?
Either way, I'd imagine I'd want RSLs for the simple reason that updating apps should result in a smaller download. Harbs On Feb 9, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > The default setting for Apache Flex is to not use RSLs because Adobe cannot > sign the Apache Flex RSLs. That's probably why your SWF is bigger. > > > On 2/8/13 10:31 PM, "grimmwerks" <gr...@grimmwerks.com> wrote: > >> Hey all - long time listener first time caller. >> >> I've taken a project that was originally 4.6 and I flipped it to 4.9; >> comparing the same code on two computers - when I build with the 4.6 sdk I >> get >> a swf of 304k (with all the other extraneous libraries such as osmf, mx, >> sparkspins, etc) -- whereas with 4.9 the main sf is 1.1mb -- that's a huge >> difference with no other changes in code no? >> >> >> >> >> Garry Schafer >> grimmwerks >> gr...@grimmwerks.com >> portfolio: www.grimmwerks.com/ >> >> >> >> > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >
