On 2/6/13 2:48 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote: > I love having overloaded functions. It's nice to have the same function name > and usage but with different data types passed. However ECMAScript does not > allow for it. Hmm, what does "not allow" mean? I haven't figured out how to code up overloaded constructors, but for other methods, I was thinking we could teach the compiler to generate decorated function names sort of like I remember C++ doing back in my Windows programming days. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
- Re: Language features Nick Collins
- Re: Language features Avi Kessner
- Re: Language features Avi Kessner
- Re: Language features Roland Zwaga
- Re: Language features Avi Kessner
- Re: Language features Alex Harui
- Re: Language features Roland Zwaga
- Re: Language features Nick Collins
- Re: Language features Alex Harui
- RE: Language features Kessler CTR Mark J
- Re: Language features Alex Harui
- RE: Language features Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Language features Alex Harui
- RE: Language features Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Language features Om
- Re: Language features Roland Zwaga
- Re: Language features Alex Harui
- RE: Language features Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Language features Roland Zwaga
- RE: Language features Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Language features Hugo Miguel Pereira Matinho