On 1/21/13 12:01 AM, "Frank Wienberg" <fr...@jangaroo.net> wrote:
> Besides ActionScript and MXML, there is a third source file format for
> which mxmlc can produce code: properties files.
> Thus, for FalconJx, like for MXML, we have to decide which way to go: either
>
> 1. let Falcon generate the temporary ActionScript class and compile that
> to JavaScript, or
> 2. produce JavaScript code or maybe even data (JSON?) directly from the
> properties file.
Sorry, I didn't read the whole email, but I believe there is a 3rd option
(and more)
3. Don't reduce string-only properties files to the current class structure,
just take them in as a string and parse them in the framework. How often do
folks actually use binary resources?
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
