Can't we just replicate what they did using the Javascript APIs?

On Jan 15, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Tolga Kaya wrote:

> *Note*: The Google Maps API for Flash has been officially deprecated as of
> September 2, 2011. The API will continue to work until September 2, 2014.
> We encourage you to migrate your code to version
> 3<https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/> of
> the Maps JavaScript API.
> 
> https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/flash/tutorial-flex
> 
> 2013/1/15 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> 
>> Forgive my ignorance, but what did the swcs provide that we're losing?
>> 
>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
>> 
>>> Google is changing their API, and dropping support for the old version
>> next
>>> year.  The SWC they currently support only supports their "v1" API which
>> is
>>> retiring.  They are not making a new one.
>>> 
>>> I wonder if ModestMaps will support the new API....
>>> 
>>> -Nick
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> What does the js Api return that is different from the flex api?  And
>> can
>>>> we build a converter before Sept 14' ?
>>>> On Jan 15, 2013 7:02 AM, "Paul Hastings" <paul.hasti...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 1/15/2013 11:34 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I use ESRI's maps in my applications with great success.  I even use
>>>> them
>>>>>> in my mobile apps.  I highly recommend them.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The POI is not nearly as populated as Google's, but they are leaps and
>>>>>> bounds ahead of everybody else.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ESRI's flex API is pretty good (our bread & butter GIS apps are all
>> based
>>>>> on it but these are all tied to client's big buck arcGIS servers) but
>>>> their
>>>>> public spatial data is nowhere near google's, especially larger scaled
>>>> data
>>>>> in urban areas. ESRI's coarser data also effects other functionality
>> like
>>>>> elevation profile & routing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> google dropping flex was a crying shame.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to