I think the slider may make the logo "pop" a bit more because of the bold
colors.  The logo by itself in the upper-right may look washed out in the
mind because it is sitting on white.  I just took a screen shot using both
Chrome and FF and did an eye-dropper compare, and they are the same on all
representations of the logo.

Still looking into the ASDocs thing.  Trying to determine where logo.jpg is
referenced.  If it is /only/ referenced in the title-bar.html page, then I
can change it out with a PNG pretty easy to get the transparency.  If not,
I might have to leave it.

-Nick

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Michael Schmalle
<apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote:

> Firefox up to date.
>
> Its just that the colors from the top left logo are not as bright as the
> logo in the larger slideshow images.
>
> Maybe it's just that the larger images "just have more color". :) The
> orange looks like a burnt orange.
>
>
> Mike
>
> Quoting Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>:
>
>  Mike,
>>
>> Which browser are you using?  I'm not seeing that our logo is washed out..
>>  I did purposefully wash out the Apache logo on the right side.
>>
>> I'll check into the Apache logo on the ASDocs.  I didn't produce that
>> (this
>> is straight from the asdocs download from the 4.9.0 release).
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Michael Schmalle
>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>**wrote:
>>
>>  Is it me or does the main header logo look really washed out?
>>>
>>> Comparing it to the home page large graphic, there seems to be some
>>> compression that happened to that image.
>>>
>>> The asdoc header logo needs transparency as well.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>:
>>>
>>>  Let me make that fix right now so I don't forget later.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Nick
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Nick Kwiatkowski (JIRA)
>>>>
>>>>> <j...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     [
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/FLEX-33343?page=**<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33343?page=**>
>>>>> com.atlassian.jira.plugin.****system.issuetabpanels:comment-****
>>>>> tabpanel&focusedCommentId=****13552306#comment-13552306<http**
>>>>> s://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/FLEX-33343?page=com.**
>>>>> atlassian.jira.plugin.system.**issuetabpanels:comment-**
>>>>> tabpanel&focusedCommentId=**13552306#comment-13552306<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552306#comment-13552306>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> ]
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Nick Kwiatkowski commented on FLEX-33343:
>>>>> > ------------------------------****-----------
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Site is ready to be switched over to production.  Will start a [VOTE]
>>>>> > thread to encourage people to review it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Only to-do for the site is more detailed documentation for future
>>>>> > contributes in the wiki.  All other TODOs are finished.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> Nick, you are awesome!
>>>>>
>>>>> When you make the move, can you please move
>>>>> http://flex.apache.org/v2/****download-installer.html<http://flex.apache.org/v2/**download-installer.html>
>>>>> <http:/**/flex.apache.org/v2/download-**installer.html<http://flex.apache.org/v2/download-installer.html>
>>>>> >to
>>>>> http://flex.apache.org/****installer.html<http://flex.apache.org/**installer.html>
>>>>> <http://flex.**apache.org/installer.html<http://flex.apache.org/installer.html>
>>>>> >?
>>>>>
>>>>>  This url is out there in the wild
>>>>> and we dont want to break it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Om
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  --
>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>
>

Reply via email to