On 05/03/2018 03:18 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:


On 04/27/2018 04:19 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
rte_eth_vhost_get_vid_from_port_id returns a value of 0 if called before
the first call to the new_device callback. A vid value >=0 suggests the
device is active which is not the case in this instance. Initialise vid
to a negative value to prevent this.

Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.lof...@intel.com>
---
   drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 1 +
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
index 99a7727..f47950c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
@@ -1051,6 +1051,7 @@ eth_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
uint16_t rx_queue_id,
                return -ENOMEM;
        }

+       vq->vid = -1;
        vq->mb_pool = mb_pool;
        vq->virtqueue_id = rx_queue_id * VIRTIO_QNUM + VIRTIO_TXQ;
        dev->data->rx_queues[rx_queue_id] = vq;


Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

On second thoughts, self-NACK.

We need to provision for the case where we want to call
eth_rx_queue_setup AFTER new_device. For instance when we want to
change the mb_pool. In this case we need to maintain the same vid and not
reset it to -1.

Without this patch the original problem still exists and need to find an
alternative workaround.

Junjie's patches fix the issue I was observing. Thanks Junjie!
https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=30a701a53737a0b6f7953412cc3b3d36c1d49122
https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=e6722dee533cda3756fbc5c9ea4ddfbf30276f1b

Along with the v2 of this patch could they be considered for the 17.11 stable 
branch?

Yes, I think it is a good idea.
It wasn't planned for -stable initially as it fixed a new use-case in
v18.05.

Junjie, can you please generate a backport against v17.11 and post it to
sta...@dpdk.org, adding "PATCH v17.11 LTS" as subject prefix, and using
-x option of when cherry-picking so that it references the patches in
master?

Thanks in advance,
Maxime
Thanks,
Ciara


Thanks,
Ciara

Reply via email to