Hi Reshma,
On 3/5/2018 4:42 PM, Reshma Pattan wrote:
Inside test_reorder_insert()
rte_mempool_get_bulk() and rte_mempool_put_bulk() are used
to allocate and free the mbufs and then rte_reorder_free()
is called which again freeing the mbufs using rte_pktmbuf_free().
The mixed use of rte_mempool_put_bulk() and rte_pktmbuf_free()
causing duplicate mbufs to be created when rte_mempool_get_bulk()
is called next in test_reorder_drain().
Since reorder library is taking care of freeing the mbufs
using rte_pktmbuf_free() change UT to allocate mbufs using
rte_pktmbuf_alloc().
Do not mix and match the bulk get/put APIs with
alloc/free APIs which can cause undefined behavior.
Fixes: d0c9b58d71 ("app/test: new reorder unit test")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: david.h...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pat...@intel.com>
---
test/test/test_reorder.c | 18 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/test/test_reorder.c b/test/test/test_reorder.c
index 65e4f38b2..b79b00961 100644
--- a/test/test/test_reorder.c
+++ b/test/test/test_reorder.c
@@ -146,11 +146,11 @@ test_reorder_insert(void)
b = rte_reorder_create("test_insert", rte_socket_id(), size);
TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(b, "Failed to create reorder buffer");
- ret = rte_mempool_get_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, num_bufs);
- TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Error getting mbuf from pool");
-
- for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++) {
+ bufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(p);
+ TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(bufs[i], "Packet allocation failed\n");
bufs[i]->seqn = i;
+ }
/* This should fill up order buffer:
* reorder_seq = 0
@@ -202,7 +202,6 @@ test_reorder_insert(void)
ret = 0;
exit:
- rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, num_bufs);
rte_reorder_free(b);
return ret;
}
@@ -227,9 +226,6 @@ test_reorder_drain(void)
b = rte_reorder_create("test_drain", rte_socket_id(), size);
TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(b, "Failed to create reorder buffer");
- ret = rte_mempool_get_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, num_bufs);
- TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Error getting mbuf from pool");
-
/* Check no drained packets if reorder is empty */
cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, robufs, 1);
if (cnt != 0) {
@@ -239,8 +235,11 @@ test_reorder_drain(void)
goto exit;
}
- for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++) {
+ bufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(p);
+ TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(bufs[i], "Packet allocation failed\n");
bufs[i]->seqn = i;
+ }
/* Insert packet with seqn 1:
* reorder_seq = 0
@@ -298,7 +297,6 @@ test_reorder_drain(void)
}
ret = 0;
exit:
- rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, num_bufs);
rte_reorder_free(b);
return ret;
}
I have one question. While the rte_reorder_free() takes care of freeing
up any mbufs that were inserted into the reorder buffer, should there
be rte_pktmbuf_free() calls for any remaining unused mbufs left in the
bufs[] array?
Regards,
Dave.