> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Declan Doherty
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 4:33 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.dohe...@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/ixgbe: add null pointer check for 
> pf_ethdev
> 
> Add NULL parameter check for rte_eth_dev_allocated() API call to
> eth_ixgbe_pci_probe().
> 
> Coverity Issue: 277216
> Fixes: cf80ba6e2038 ("net/ixgbe: add support for representor ports")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <declan.dohe...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c 
> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> index 283dd7e49..75f927c06 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -1747,6 +1747,9 @@ eth_ixgbe_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv 
> __rte_unused,
>       struct rte_eth_dev *pf_ethdev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(
>               pci_dev->device.name);
> 
> +     if (pf_ethdev == NULL)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
>       for (i = 0; i < eth_da.nb_representor_ports; i++) {
>               struct ixgbe_vf_info *vfinfo;
>               struct ixgbe_vf_representor representor;
> --

Looks good - can I just ask to move pf_ethdev definition to the top of the 
function?
To comply with dpdk coding style.
Konstantin

> 2.14.3

Reply via email to