> On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:03 AM, Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 17-Apr-18 3:48 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
>>> On Apr 11, 2018, at 5:30 AM, Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Reduce dependency on internal details of EAL memory subsystem, and
>>> simplify code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
>>> Tested-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com>
>>> Tested-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
>>> Tested-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
>>> index 58afeb7..c96e134 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
>>> @@ -234,10 +234,9 @@ struct mlx5_mr *
>>> mlx5_mr_new(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_mempool *mp)
>>> {
>>> struct priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
>>> - const struct rte_memseg *ms = rte_eal_get_physmem_layout();
>>> + const struct rte_memseg *ms;
>>> uintptr_t start;
>>> uintptr_t end;
>>> - unsigned int i;
>>> struct mlx5_mr *mr;
>>>
>>> mr = rte_zmalloc_socket(__func__, sizeof(*mr), 0, mp->socket_id);
>>> @@ -261,17 +260,15 @@ mlx5_mr_new(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct
>>> rte_mempool *mp)
>>> /* Save original addresses for exact MR lookup. */
>>> mr->start = start;
>>> mr->end = end;
>>> +
>>> /* Round start and end to page boundary if found in memory segments. */
>>> - for (i = 0; (i < RTE_MAX_MEMSEG) && (ms[i].addr != NULL); ++i) {
>>> - uintptr_t addr = (uintptr_t)ms[i].addr;
>>> - size_t len = ms[i].len;
>>> - unsigned int align = ms[i].hugepage_sz;
>>> + ms = rte_mem_virt2memseg((void *)start);
>>> + if (ms != NULL)
>>> + start = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(start, ms->hugepage_sz);
>>> + ms = rte_mem_virt2memseg((void *)end);
>>> + if (ms != NULL)
>>> + end = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(end, ms->hugepage_sz);
>> It is buggy. The memory region is [start, end), so if the memseg of 'end'
>> isn't
>> allocated yet, the returned ms will have zero entries and this will make
>> 'end'
>> zero. Instead, the following will be fine.
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
>> index fdf7b3e88..39bbe2481 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
>> @@ -265,9 +265,7 @@ mlx5_mr_new(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_mempool
>> *mp)
>> ms = rte_mem_virt2memseg((void *)start, NULL);
>> if (ms != NULL)
>> start = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(start, ms->hugepage_sz);
>> - ms = rte_mem_virt2memseg((void *)end, NULL);
>> - if (ms != NULL)
>> - end = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(end, ms->hugepage_sz);
>> + end = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(end, ms->hugepage_sz);
>> DRV_LOG(DEBUG,
>> "port %u mempool %p using start=%p end=%p size=%zu for
>> memory"
>> Same for mlx4. Please fix both mlx5 and mlx4 so that we can verify the new
>> design.
>> However, this code block will be removed eventually. I've done a patchset to
>> accommodate your memory hotplug design and I'll send it out soon.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for raising this. I'll submit a patch shortly.
I didn't notice that your patchset has been merged. I thought you were to send
out
a new version.
Never mind. I'll send out a fix.
Thanks,
Yongseok
>
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Yongseok
>>> - if ((start > addr) && (start < addr + len))
>>> - start = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(start, align);
>>> - if ((end > addr) && (end < addr + len))
>>> - end = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(end, align);
>>> - }
>>> DRV_LOG(DEBUG,
>>> "port %u mempool %p using start=%p end=%p size=%zu for memory"
>>> " region",
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Anatoly
