On 4/5/2018 9:31 AM, Vipin Varghese wrote:
> Add TUN PMD validation for create, port setup, tx, rx and stats functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.vargh...@intel.com>
> ---
> test/test/Makefile | 4 +
> test/test/autotest_data.py | 13 ++
> test/test/meson.build | 4 +
> test/test/test_tun.c | 333
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 354 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 test/test/test_tun.c
>
> diff --git a/test/test/Makefile b/test/test/Makefile
> index a88cc38..e5d8200 100644
> --- a/test/test/Makefile
> +++ b/test/test/Makefile
> @@ -193,6 +193,10 @@ endif
>
> SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_KVARGS) += test_kvargs.c
>
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_TAP),y)
> +SRCS-y += test_tun.c
> +endif
> +
> CFLAGS += -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API
>
> CFLAGS += -O3
> diff --git a/test/test/autotest_data.py b/test/test/autotest_data.py
> index aacfe0a..35f3aab 100644
> --- a/test/test/autotest_data.py
> +++ b/test/test/autotest_data.py
> @@ -357,6 +357,19 @@ def per_sockets(num):
> ]
> },
> {
> + "Prefix": "tun",
> + "Memory": "512",
> + "Tests":
> + [
> + {
> + "Name": "TUN autotest",
> + "Command": "tun_autotest",
> + "Func": default_autotest,
> + "Report": None,
> + },
> + ]
> + },
> + {
Hi Vipin,
Thanks for providing unit test for the feature you have added. *I believe we
need more unit test in DPDK.*
Only a few questions:
1- Should this be part of auto test?
2- Second running of the tun_autotest is failing, exit test and re-run works,
any idea?
Overall I am for merging this unit test if there is no objection.
Thanks,
ferruh
