On 17-Apr-18 12:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
I see no reason to accept this patch, replacing strdup by snprintf, given that we have strlcpy. Please do a v3 with strlcpy.
OK. Please also fix the typo in patch headline :) -- Thanks, Anatoly
On 17-Apr-18 12:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
I see no reason to accept this patch, replacing strdup by snprintf, given that we have strlcpy. Please do a v3 with strlcpy.
OK. Please also fix the typo in patch headline :) -- Thanks, Anatoly