Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: replace rte_panic instances to return an error value

[Arnon Warshavsky]

>
> You are talking about API, and I agree the old applications can keep
> considering the functions as void.
> But I was talking about ABI, meaning: can we use an old application
> without recompiling and update only the DPDK (in .so file)?
>
>
> You are right of course. Once again I mixed the two..
I will modify accordingly