> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 2:02 AM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong <zhiyong.y...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> y...@fridaylinux.org; Tan, Jianfeng <jianfeng....@intel.com>; Bie, Tiwei
> <tiwei....@intel.com>; Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.w...@intel.com>
> Cc: Wang, Dong1 <dong1.w...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net/virtio-user: support server mode
>
>
>
> On 02/14/2018 03:53 PM, Zhiyong Yang wrote:
> > virtio user adds to support for server mode.
> >
> > Virtio user with server mode creates socket file and then starts to
> > wait for first connection from vhost user with client mode in blocking mode.
> >
> > Server mode virtio user supports many times' vhost reconnections with
> > same configurations.
> >
> > Support only one connection at the same time in server mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.y...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 9 ++-
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c | 77
> ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c | 44 +++++++++----
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 81
> ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 4 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > index 884f74ad0..44d037d6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1273,9 +1273,13 @@ static void
> > virtio_notify_peers(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > {
> > struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private;
> > - struct virtnet_rx *rxvq = dev->data->rx_queues[0];
> > + struct virtnet_rx *rxvq = NULL;
> I don't think it is needed to assign to NULL here.
Ok.
>
> > struct rte_mbuf *rarp_mbuf;
> >
> > + if (!dev->data->rx_queues)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + rxvq = dev->data->rx_queues[0];
> The above change is valid, but I think it should be in a dedicated patch, as
> it
> might be backported to -stable.
>
Ok, it will cause crash in some cases. For example, the code goes here before
memory allocation of rxvq is done.
> > rarp_mbuf = rte_net_make_rarp_packet(rxvq->mpool,
> > (struct ether_addr *)hw->mac_addr);
> > if (rarp_mbuf == NULL) {
> > @@ -1333,7 +1337,8 @@ virtio_interrupt_handler(void *param)
> >
> > if (isr & VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE) {
> > virtio_notify_peers(dev);
> > - virtio_ack_link_announce(dev);
> > + if (hw->cvq) > +
> virtio_ack_link_announce(dev);
> Is this change also related to server mode?
> It may deserve a dedicated patch too.
Above changes are not related to server mode. :).
Just looks more reasonable.
If format extra two patches, Should I put them in this series or in another
series?
Thanks
Zhiyong
> > }
> > }
>
> Thanks,
> Maxime
