On 2/13/2018 10:37 AM, Olivier Matz wrote: > Hi, > > The next Technical Board meeting will happen on IRC freenode #dpdk-board > this wednesday 14 february 3pm UTC. > > You will find links to the agenda and previous meetings on this page: > http://dpdk.org/dev/techboard-minutes > The last one is not yet on the website: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-February/090698.html > > Please send on any items requiring techboard attention.
Can we discuss following process patch: https://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/33250/ Mainly the issue is how to approach a patch that effects other parts of the DPDK, who should update those dependent parts, the initiator of the feature or the maintainer of those parts? Two opposed arguments on issue: - If initiator doesn't fix the dependent code, somebody needs to follow the dependent parts to do the work, which is a maintenance cost keep growing by time. - If initiator has to do the all work, this is too much work for initiator and may prevent improvements because of too much work, or because of missing knowledge in dependent parts. Thanks, ferruh > > Thanks, > Olivier >
