HI Fiona 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Verma, Shally
>Sent: 12 January 2018 19:24
>To: 'Trahe, Fiona' <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <[email protected]>; Sahu, Sunila 
><[email protected]>; Challa, Mahipal
><[email protected]>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad 
><[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
><[email protected]>; Jain, Deepak K <[email protected]>; 
>Roy Pledge <[email protected]>; Youri Querry
><[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]>; Ahmed 
>Mansour <[email protected]>; De Lara
>Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Fiona
>
>> I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the 
>> maintainers about getting one set up.
>Sure. Please share us details when it is available. I assume it will be 
>created once API spec move from RFC to 1st version?
>
[Shally] Any update on this? We're available with sample SW ZLIB based 
implementation (currently proof-concepted for stateless only) . So, if any repo 
is available, we can upload it there.

>Thanks
>Shally
>
>From: Trahe, Fiona [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: 12 January 2018 00:31
>To: Verma, Shally <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <[email protected]>; Sahu, Sunila 
><[email protected]>; Challa, Mahipal
><[email protected]>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad 
><[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
><[email protected]>; Jain, Deepak K <[email protected]>; 
>Roy Pledge <[email protected]>; Youri Querry
><[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]>; Ahmed 
>Mansour <[email protected]>; Trahe,
>Fiona <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo 
><[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Shally,
>
>
>From: Verma, Shally [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM
>To: Trahe, Fiona <mailto:[email protected]>; mailto:[email protected]
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <mailto:[email protected]>; Sahu, Sunila 
><mailto:[email protected]>; Challa, Mahipal
><mailto:[email protected]>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad 
><mailto:[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch,
>Pablo <mailto:[email protected]>; Jain, Deepak K 
><mailto:[email protected]>; Roy Pledge
><mailto:[email protected]>; Youri Querry <mailto:[email protected]>; 
>Hemant Agrawal
><mailto:[email protected]>; Ahmed Mansour <mailto:[email protected]>
>Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Fiona
>
>We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK 
>compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would
>like to check
>If you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your 
>development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we
>could leverage joint effort.
>Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common repo for 
>joint development or send it as RFC patch.
>
>Let me know your opinion on same.
>[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted if you 
>would do this, I agree it's a
>good way to prove out the API.
>We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to share 
>these with you, and continue to develop these
>jointly so the same test sets can be targeted against all PMDs.
>I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the 
>maintainers about getting one set up.
>
>Thanks
>Shally

Reply via email to