Hi Shahaf,

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 07:08:20PM +0200, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> Secondary process is not allowed to register mempools on the flight.
> 
> The code will return invalid memory key for such case.
> 
> Fixes: 87ec44ce1651 ("net/mlx5: add operations for secondary process")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemi...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst     |  7 ++++++-
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> index bdc2216c0..2f860402f 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> @@ -106,7 +106,12 @@ Limitations
>  
>  - Inner RSS for VXLAN frames is not supported yet.
>  - Hardware checksum RX offloads for VXLAN inner header are not supported yet.
> -- Forked secondary process not supported.
> +- For secondary process:
> +
> +  - Forked secondary process not supported.
> +  - All mempools must be initialized before rte_eth_dev_start().
> +  - Number of mempools must less than CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MLX5_TX_MP_CACHE

Why such limitation?  Registering a new memory is independent of
searching a new one when the cache is too small.

>  - Flow pattern without any specific vlan will match for vlan packets as well:
>  
>    When VLAN spec is not specified in the pattern, the matching rule will be 
> created with VLAN as a wild card.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h
> index a63364d79..79cdfc793 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h
> @@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ mlx5_tx_mb2mr(struct mlx5_txq_data *txq, struct rte_mbuf 
> *mb)
>       uint16_t i = txq->mr_cache_idx;
>       uintptr_t addr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mb, uintptr_t);
>       struct mlx5_mr *mr;
> +     struct rte_mempool *mp;
>  
>       assert(i < RTE_DIM(txq->mp2mr));
>       if (likely(txq->mp2mr[i]->start <= addr && txq->mp2mr[i]->end >= addr))
> @@ -563,14 +564,24 @@ mlx5_tx_mb2mr(struct mlx5_txq_data *txq, struct 
> rte_mbuf *mb)
>               if (txq->mp2mr[i]->start <= addr &&
>                   txq->mp2mr[i]->end >= addr) {
>                       assert(txq->mp2mr[i]->lkey != (uint32_t)-1);
> -                     assert(rte_cpu_to_be_32(txq->mp2mr[i]->mr->lkey) ==
> -                            txq->mp2mr[i]->lkey);
> +                     if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> +                             assert(rte_cpu_to_be_32(txq->mp2mr[i]->mr->lkey)
> +                                    == txq->mp2mr[i]->lkey);
> +                     }

This code should be inside priv_txq_mp2mr_reg() to let the secondary
search inside the MR list when the cache is too small.

If it does not find any MR it should fail before calling
priv_mr_new().

>                       txq->mr_cache_idx = i;
>                       return txq->mp2mr[i]->lkey;
>               }
>       }
>       txq->mr_cache_idx = 0;
> -     mr = mlx5_txq_mp2mr_reg(txq, mlx5_tx_mb2mp(mb), i);
> +     mp = mlx5_tx_mb2mp(mb);
> +     if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> +             WARN("Using unregistered mempool 0x%p(%s) in secondary process,"
> +                  " please create mempool before rte_eth_dev_start()",
> +                  (void *)mp, mp->name);
> +             assert(rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY);
> +             return (uint32_t)-1;
> +     }
> +     mr = mlx5_txq_mp2mr_reg(txq, mp, i);
>       /*
>        * Request the reference to use in this queue, the original one is
>        * kept by the control plane.
> -- 
> 2.12.0

-- 
Nélio Laranjeiro
6WIND

Reply via email to