Hi All, I'm looking at the output of app/test >> dump_log_types
There are a number of naming systems, and I think it would be good to standardize on one (before we diverge further than we already have..) Below a summary of current state, which is becoming a little messy IMO. A proposed (hopefully consistent) naming scheme suggested below that again. Based on the suggested scheme, I think the OPDL PMD and OcteonTX would change - so adding Maintainers of those components to CC. Feedback welcome, -Harry === Current State === ===================== Libraries: lib.<name> Ethdev PMDs: pmd.<name>.info pmd.<name>.driver Other PMDs pmd.<platform>.ethdev pmd.<platform>.ethdev.init pmd.<platform>.eventdev pmd.<platform>.mempool More PMDs: eventdev.<pmd-name>.init eventdev.<pmd-name>.driver === Suggested Consistent Schema === =================================== Libraries: lib.<name>.specialization Net PMDs: pmd.<name>.specialization // one could argue consistency would be pmd.ethdev.<name> // but the change is larger than the value IMO - thoughts? Eventdev PMDs: pmd.eventdev.<name>.specialization Crypto PMDs: pmd.cryptodev.<name>.specialization BBdev PMDs: pmd.bbdev.<name>.specialization Busses: bus.<name>.specialization
