16/01/2018 11:21, Shreyansh Jain: > On Monday 15 January 2018 04:24 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 02/01/2018 13:57, Shreyansh Jain: > >> +struct skeleton_firmware { > >> + struct skeleton_firmware_version_info firmware_version; > >> + /**< Device firmware information */ > >> + enum skeleton_firmware_state firmware_state; > >> + /**< Device state */ > >> +}; > >> + > >> +#define SKELETON_MAX_ATTRIBUTES 10 > >> +#define SKELETON_ATTRIBUTE_NAME_MAX 20 > >> + > >> +struct skeleton_rawdev_attributes { > >> + char *name; > >> + /**< Name of the attribute */ > >> + uint64_t value; > >> + /**< Value or reference of value of attribute */ > >> +}; > >> + > >> +#define SKELETON_CAPA_FW_LOAD 0x0001 > >> +/**< Device supports firmware loading/unloading */ > >> +#define SKELETON_CAPA_FW_RESET 0x0002 > >> +/**< Device supports firmware reset */ > >> +#define SKELETON_CAPA_QUEUES 0x0004 > >> +/**< Device support queue based communication */ > > > > Comment about the style. The style is important :) > > You are always writing comments after the item. > > Yes, I was trying to stick to single method - postfix. > > > When comments are on a separate line, I think it is preferred to write > > them *before* the item they describe. > > > > Consider this: > > struct dummy { > int a; /**< a postfix comment */ > /**< a prefix comment */ > int b; > }; > > Personally, Even I prefer prefix when it comes to full line comments - > but mixing prefix and postfix can lead to non-readable code. > > Anyways - I was referring [1] > > [1] > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/documentation.html#doxygen-guidelines > > and it seems that I should change all to prefix in case any comment in > the structure is not fitting into a single line. > I will do that.
OK thanks