Once the device is created, it is not possible to hot-add new
queues. If it happens, it could confuse the application, as
the new queue might not be initialized but nr_vring is
incremented.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
---
 lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
index e54795a41..f94fd16cf 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
@@ -1220,13 +1220,23 @@ vhost_user_check_and_alloc_queue_pair(struct virtio_net 
*dev, VhostUserMsg *msg)
        if (vring_idx >= VHOST_MAX_VRING) {
                RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
                        "invalid vring index: %u\n", vring_idx);
-               return -1;
+               return -EINVAL;
        }
 
        if (dev->virtqueue[vring_idx])
                return 0;
 
-       return alloc_vring_queue(dev, vring_idx);
+       /* Queues cannot be added dynamically */
+       if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING) {
+               RTE_LOG(DEBUG, VHOST_CONFIG,
+                               "Cannot allocate new queue, device is 
running\n");
+               return -EPERM;
+       }
+
+       if (alloc_vring_queue(dev, vring_idx) < 0)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       return 0;
 }
 
 int
@@ -1274,7 +1284,10 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
                        vhost_message_str[msg.request.master]);
 
        ret = vhost_user_check_and_alloc_queue_pair(dev, &msg);
-       if (ret < 0) {
+       if (ret == -EPERM) {
+               RTE_LOG(DEBUG, VHOST_CONFIG, "Skipping message\n");
+                       goto out;
+       } else if (ret < 0) {
                RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
                        "failed to alloc queue\n");
                return -1;
@@ -1383,6 +1396,7 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
 
        }
 
+out:
        if (msg.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY) {
                msg.payload.u64 = !!ret;
                msg.size = sizeof(msg.payload.u64);
-- 
2.14.3

Reply via email to