> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 4:23 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dai, Wei <wei....@intel.com>; Wang, Liang-min
> <liang-min.w...@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] net/e1000: fix mailbox interrupt handler
> 
> Mailbox interrupt handler only take care of the PF reset notification, for
> other message mbx->ops.read should not be called since it get chance to
> break the foreground VF to PF communication.
> 
> Fixes: 316f4f1adc2e ("net/igb: support VF mailbox interrupt for link
> up/down")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Dai <wei....@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c index fdc139f..0d8bc49 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c
> @@ -2970,13 +2970,17 @@ void igbvf_mbx_process(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev)
>       struct e1000_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
>       u32 in_msg = 0;
> 
> -     if (mbx->ops.read(hw, &in_msg, 1, 0))
> -             return;
> +     /* peek the message first */
> +     in_msg = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_VMBMEM(0));
> 
>       /* PF reset VF event */
> -     if (in_msg == E1000_PF_CONTROL_MSG)
> +     if (in_msg == E1000_PF_CONTROL_MSG) {
> +             /* dummy mbx read to ack pf */
> +             if (mbx->ops.read(hw, &in_msg, 1, 0))
> +                     return;
>               _rte_eth_dev_callback_process(dev,
> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET,
>                                             NULL, NULL);
> +     }
>  }
> 
>  static int
> --
> 2.7.4

Reply via email to