On 1/11/2018 2:07 AM, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > Hi Stephen, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] >> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 1:15 AM >> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/14] net/avf: initialization of avf PMD >> >> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:15:49 +0800 >> Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo...@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> + >>> +#define AVF_MAX_NUM_QUEUES 16 >>> +/* Vlan table size */ >>> +#define AVF_VLAN_TB_SIZE (4096 / (CHAR_BIT * >>> sizeof(uint32_t))) >> >> You could use ETHER_MAX_VLAN_ID (which is 4095). >> Also it is most efficient if bit tables use unsigned long to access. > Thanks for the suggestion. > I found this macro is useless. I'd like just removing it. > > Hi Ferruh, > As this patch set is accepted to next-net, I can sent a fixes patch for this > change. Is it OK? Would you like helping merge the fixes to the original > patch? Thanks.
Hi Wenzhuo, That is OK, I can squash fixes on top original set in next-net.
