<...> > The port representor infrastructure is enabled through a single common, device > independent, virtual PMD whos context is initialized and enabled through a > broker instance running within the context of the physical function device > driver.> > +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+ > | rte_ethdev | | rte_ethdev | > +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+ > | Physical Function PMD | | Port Reperesentor PMD | > | +-------------+ | | +---------+ +---------+ | > | | Representor | | | | dev_data| | dev_ops | | > | | Broker | | | +----+----+ +----+----+ | > | | +---------+ | | +------|-----------|------+ > | | | VF Port | | | | | > | | | Context +------------------+ | > | | +---------+ | | | > | | +---------+ | | | > | | | Handler +------------------------------+ > | | | Ops | | | > | | +---------+ | | > | +-------------+ | > +-------------------------+ > > Creation of representor ports can be achieved either through the --vdev EAL > option or through the rte_vdev_init() API. Each port representor requires the > BDF of it's parent PF and the Virtual Function ID of the port which the > representor will support. During initialization of the representor PMD, it > calls > the broker API to register itself with the PF PMD and to get it's context > configured which includes the setting up of it's context and ops function > handlers.
Above no more true, right?