On 12/14/2017 6:28 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> When allocating a new mbuf for Rx, the value of m->data_off should not
> be reset to its default value (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM), instead of reusing
> the previous undefined value, which could cause the packet to have a too
> small or too high headroom.
>
> Fixes: 2eb53b134aae ("net/bnxt: add initial Rx code")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c
> index 188df362e..3fff4d437 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline int bnxt_alloc_rx_data(struct bnxt_rx_queue
> *rxq,
>
> rx_buf->mbuf = data;
>
> - rxbd->addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(RTE_MBUF_DATA_DMA_ADDR(rx_buf->mbuf));
> + rxbd->addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(rte_mbuf_data_dma_addr_default(data));
Hi Olivier,
Using deprecated rte_mbuf_data_dma_addr_default() breaks build for this commit.
What do you think using directly rte_mbuf_data_iova_default() in this patch?
Thanks,
ferruh
