On 12/12/2017 10:27 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:56:40AM -0800, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 12/10/2017 9:27 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
Hi all,
Most templates are showing copyright first and SPDX later i.e. the
typical way for writing the license.
However some projects has followed it other way around to make it easy
for tools i.e. the TOP line.
I agree with Ferruh that we shall follow single convention. I will
prefer to do it in following way to make it consistent. (I will also fix
my change patches).
>> Copyright (C) [YEAR] NAME-OF-COPYRIGHT-HOLDER
>> Copyright (C) [YEAR] NAME-OF-COPYRIGHT-HOLDER-2
>> Copyright (C) [YEAR] NAME-OF-COPYRIGHT-HOLDER-3
>> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
Stephen mentioned Linux already has a defined syntax for this, unless there is a
good reason to change I think we can follow same syntax, what do you think?
As far as I can see, it's not yet integrated in Linux. The latest
documentation I can find as of today is:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10091607/
About the first line:
"""
The SPDX license identifier in kernel files shall be added at the first
possible line in a file which can contain a comment. For the majority
"""
Some recomandations look a bit inconsistent to me, but I didn't follow
all the history:
"""
C source: // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
C header: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
"""
I tried to study the other repositories using the SPDX tagging e.g.
uboot (http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=tree) and odp etc. They
followed the syntax of copyright followed by SPDX.
Also, typically all dpdk files starts with "/*-", I am not sure about
the purpose of the "-"?
Olivier
